|



Why Do You Blame?
By Dr.Margaret Paul November 17, 2008
Do you find yourself blaming others for your feelings? Discover
how you are actually causing your own feelings of anger or hurt and what you can do differently.
Take a moment to think about who you blame for your feelings
of hurt, anger, resentment, aloneness, emptiness, loneliness, helplessness, inadequacy, shame, depression, anxiety, fear,
and so on. What is really going on inside when you blame someone else for your feelings?
Many people have a strong
belief that other people are the cause of their feelings - that they are victims of others' choices - so they have a right
to blame others. The belief that others cause your feelings generally starts early in childhood when parents blamed each other,
or you, for their feelings. Most people do not grow up seeing parents or other caregivers take responsibility for causing
or for nurturing their own feelings. Nor do they see people learning from their feelings. Instead, they see people avoiding
their feelings in various ways, such as using addictions to numb them out, or using blame to dump them onto others.
If
you have a deep belief that others cause your feelings, then it seems only right to blame them for causing your pain or not
making you happy. When you come from this belief, the only way you can move out of feeling like a victim is to try to control
the other person into not doing the thing that you think is causing your pain, or to do the thing that you think will make
you happy.
Blame is always a form of control that originates in the wounded part of oneself that hates to feel helpless.
Rather than accept your powerlessness over others' choices, you convince yourself that if you blame the other person, you
can get the other to behave the way you want.
The problem is that the belief that others cause your feelings is not
true.
For example, let's say that you come home after a difficult day wanting to share your day with your partner and
your partner is on the phone. You indicate that you want to speak with him/her but your partner keeps talking on the phone.
If you end up feeling hurt and angry, it is easy to believe that it is your partner's neglect that is causing your hurt and
anger. But let's take two different inner reactions to see what is really causing these feelings.
- You say to yourself, "My partner doesn't care about me. I'm
not important to him/her."
If this is what you say to yourself, then of course
you will feel hurt and angry, but it is not because of what your partner is doing - it is because of what you are telling
yourself. Once you make the assumption that your partner's behavior indicates a lack of caring, you might overtly blame your
partner for your feelings by getting angry, or you might covertly blame by shutting down, punishing your partner through withdrawing
your love.
- You say to yourself, "My partner is busy right now with something
important to him/her, so I will take this opportunity to relax and decompress so we can have a nice time later sharing the
events of our day."
If this is what you say to yourself, then you would
not end up feeling hurt and angry, and you would not blame and punish your partner.
Let's take another situation. You have picked up something at the hardware store for
the house and your partner blames you for getting the wrong thing, saying, "This is not what I told you to get. Can't you
ever do anything right?"
In this case, your partner has judged you as being inadequate or stupid. You feel hurt at
being treated badly and you lash out in blame, "I just got what you told me to get. You are a bad communicator. There's never
any pleasing you."
Doesn't it seem logical that your anger and hurt are coming from your partner's judgment of you?
If you said to yourself, "I'm inadequate, I'm stupid," then you will feel hurt and angry. However, if you said to
yourself, "It looks like my partner had a bad day," and didn't take your partner's blame personally, you might feel compassion
instead of hurt and anger. You might respond with, "Honey, have you had a difficult day?"
Blaming another is always
a way to avoid responsibility for what you are telling yourself and how you are treating yourself that is causing your feelings.
source site: click here


Relationships: Why Do You Attack and Blame?
By Dr. Margaret Paul January 12, 2009
Do you often find yourself angry and blaming in your relationships and you have no idea why you are behaving this way? Discover
some of the reasons in this article.
"A woman who
I was dating and who I really liked ended our relationship and is dating someone else. I see her all the time at the market
and I feel like yelling at her."
"I keep vowing not to, but I keep getting really
angry at my husband when he is distant."
"I lost my temper with my assistant and now she is suing me. I just can't seem
to help getting furious when people mess up."
If this is like you, do you know why
you continue act this way, even when your angry behavior generally doesn't work and may end up creating more problems for you? Do you know what is going on for you when
you attack and blame? Below are some of the reasons. See if you identity with any of them:
While sometimes you
might be able to intimidate or guilt a person into doing what you want, you can NEVER have control over how a person thinks and feels. At some point, even if a person complies out of fear or guilt, it may backfire on you.
The problem is that
true power comes from power over self, not power over others. While having control over another might feel good in the moment, since true self-esteem comes from power within, controlling behavior over others never ultimately leads to feeling safe or secure. In fact, it leads to more fear and insecurity when others respond by distancing themselves from you, or resenting you, or resisting you, or rejecting you and leaving you.
The problem is that
getting angry and blaming are forms of self-abandonment. While you might believe that it is others, situations, events, or the past that are creating your pain, it is the fact that you are ignoring your feelings rather than taking responsibility for them that is actually causing your painful feelings. Until you learn how to take responsibility for your feelings, you might continue to cover them up with your anger and blame.
- You really believe that your pain is caused by others rather than by your own self-abandonment, so you feel justified in blaming others for your feelings.
As long as you believe that your painful feelings of anger, fear, hurt, anxiety, depression, guilt or shame are caused by something outside yourself, rather than from your own thoughts and actions, you will see yourself as a victim and have a need to try to control others.
As long as you avoid responsibility for learning your manage your feelings of loneliness, heartache, sorrow, grief and helplessness over others, you will try to cover these feelings up with your addiction to anger and blame.
Learning to take 100% responsibility for your own feelings is the key to moving beyond anger and blame. Learning and practicing the Inner Bonding process is a powerful way to learn responsibility for your feelings.
source site: click here
1. Let
people in the family know that you're blaming yourself or feeling hurt because others are blaming you. Your willingness to talk with others is the way to move
forward.
2. If
you're the relative of a person who's feeling guilt or sadness, let the person know that you may be angry but don't blame
them. Sometimes during difficult times, silence by family members can be interpreted as blame.
3. Remind
yourself and others about factors beyond personal control that have helped create the difficulty or crisis.
4. Talk
with others in similar situations. When you visit with a respected friend you may see things in a different way.
5. Remember,
"to err is human."


Blame And Responsibility
"Round & round in the usual old game...
and it's all your fault!" The ever-popular blame-game...
see it on any street corner, in any queue, in any office or boardroom or works canteen, any time you like...
Blame and responsibility seem to go hand in hand: "who is responsible for this mess?" yells an irate school-teacher, as he surveys the aftermath of a few minutes' worth of over-exuberance from his students.
Which is odd, though, because in many ways they're opposites: responsibility is, literally, 'response-ability', the ability to respond in the present; whereas blame is mostly concerned with the avoidance of responsibility - assigning it to someone else or somewhen else.
Without responsibility, we have no power; without power, we have no choice. It's as simple as that. So the more we try to avoid responsibility by blaming, the less power and less choice, we have; the more we allow others to offload their responsibilities onto us by blaming us, the less power and less choice, that we all have available to share. So we need to separate responsibility and blame and distinguish clearly between them: but that's not quite as simple
as it sounds...


Blaming the world
A simple question to start
with: why does it always seem so much easier to blame
- blame anyone, or anything - than to accept responsibility? It's weird...
It's been
a bad day: I've had yet another one of my infamous rows with Mary at work, straight after having to deal with one of our more
obnoxious clients; Kaye's blaming me
for having mislaid a file that Mary says is crucial, but I know it's her fault that it's gone missing.
And now,
rushing out from the supermarket, trying to make up for lost time, I've just tripped over and dropped the whole lot on the
floor. Broken eggs and broken bottles everywhere; coffee and honey and cooking-oil all mixed up with toilet tissue and
breakfast cereal and Gawd only knows what else.
Chaos! Panic! "Why does
this always happen to me? Why is the universe conspiring against me?", I wail; but strangely enough, nobody's
listening...
Stop for a moment, Chris,
says an inner voice:
- "try listening to yourself... you might just see what's going on behind that maze of blame... "
So yes, I stop for a
moment: the panic eases, softens. All right, yes, it's true, it doesn't "always happen to me": it just happens on rare
occasions - like right now.
And it probably wouldn't have
happened if I hadn't been so busy blaming everyone else that I forgot to look where I was
going. Right. There's still one heck of a mess there on the floor, but at least I'm able to respond to it now...
So go back to an incident
of your own which had that same feeling of "why does this always happen to me?" Sometimes, as we've seen, there is
an element of geez, of something which does "always happen to me" - but it's much more likely to have been tied up
with getting lost in blame.
If so, how - if at all
- did you recognize that you were lost in blame - using blame to avoid your
own responsibility? How - if at all - did you reclaim that responsibility, to deal with the task in hand? If you 'passed the buck' to someone else, what happened? And how did you feel
about what happened?
Life seems so much easier,
being a victim: it's always someone else's fault and it's always someone else's responsibility to fix it. Being a victim, we can blame others in the past in order to
avoid responsibility in the present: "if
only they hadn't done that to me, I'd be able to..."
The catch with 'playing victim'
is that we then need someone else to play the Parent and do the fixing for us: and if everyone's busily playing victim
- locked into 'a culture of complaint', to use Robert Hughes' term - then nothing is ever going to get fixed...
A victim is literally 'a conquered
one': it's an accurate enough label for someone who's in shock, or actively recovering from some traumatic incident, but most
of the time, bluntly, self-styled 'victims' are more likely to be playing the blame-game
for all it's worth - if only to gain "that special attention which is the perogative of the miserable".
What they rarely seem able
to see is that the only way out of the situation about which they're so loudly complaining is to acknowledge their own responsibility in the affair: but since that's what they - we - are usually most avoiding, there tends to be an awful lot of 'round and round the garden' before any change starts to happen...
I'm
sitting in the café on a quiet Sunday morning, when in storms Julie, wanting someone to talk at. "That's another lousy
man I've had to get rid of out of my life!" she says, gesticulating wildly. "He insulted me, so I slapped him - I mean, what
else could I do?
And, d'you know, he not
only had the nerve to get cross about it, but he even threatened me:
- 'I'll hit you back if you do that again'
- that's what he said! I mean, I ask you! Why do I always get
these creeps, Chris? That's the third time this year... Are all men bastards, or are there any good ones out
there?"
- once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is
enemy action... but who's 'the enemy' here?
Men - or Julie's own reliance
on blame?
She sees another friend across
the way and moves over there to pour out her tale of woe once more. But just as I breathe a sigh of relief, in walks Geoff - who does exactly the same.
"Bloody women! Blood-sucking
leeches, the lot of them!" What is it this time, Geoff? "Sarah - you know. All those things I gave her: I mean, she
took them from me and now she's gone. Gone off with Barry. Hope she does the same to him, the swine... Took everything
I gave her and never a word of thanks!"
Did she ask you for
any of it, Geoff? Did you ask her for anything in return? "No, I just gave it to her, didn't I, but so what? I don't
know what you're on about: I mean, she took everything, didn't she? Bitch... Are there any good women out there,
Chris?"
And a slightly nastier thought crosses my mind:
- Geoff, meet Julie; Julie, meet Geoff; you've got a lot in common,
you'd get on like a house on fire... literally...
Who do you know like Geoff
or Julie, so busy blaming the world that they don't notice the part they play in
creating their own mess? Why is it so easy for us to see what's really going on, but so hard for them to do so?
Stop for a moment, though and
turn this round: how much do you play the same blame-game as Julie and
Geoff? (It'll be embarrassing to explore this, but do it anyway.)
From this side
of the mirror, it'll be hard for you to see what's going on, but much easier for others to do so; so perhaps you can use those
others as 'allies', to show you how you're contributing to your own problems. Who could you do this with? Perhaps more
to the point, who would you feel safe to ask to do this for you?
No one is immune from the blame-game; everyone does it to varying degrees at varying stages of their life.
Ultimately, no one - no one individual - is ever to blame, because everyone
is to blame: the threads of wyrd pass through us all and we're all shirking
some part of our responsibilities somewhere in there. It's not exactly comforting to face that, but at least it's honest - which blame rarely is.
The whole purpose of the blame-game is to 'export' responsibility to others: that way, we hope we'll be able to avoid the work that being 'response-able' always involves. But Reality Department rarely lets us get away with it - although
sometimes the ways with which it works back to us can be more than a little weird...
One form of the blame-game begins when we 'project' onto others what we're feeling, but don't want to admit to, or are too embarrassed or too frightened to admit to: "what's wrong with you? why are you angry?", I ask, when it's obvious that the only one who's angry is me, but I don't want to admit it.
Another form of the game starts
by assigning responsibility to others for what are our actions, our choices:
- "You made me love you! you can't leave me!", I wail, carefully avoiding the possibility that my clingy dependence isn't something anyone would want as part of their 'We'...
"Why aren't you with that group any more, Chris?" asks a friend; "you were very involved with them:
what happened?"
"Oh, they pushed me out -
did the dirty on me after all my hard work - didn't you know?"
In reality, they'd done nothing
of the kind:
habitual 'issue-hopping' and a short attention-span - but it's much easier to blame
them than to face the embarrassing fact that I'd broken my promised commitment to them...
Look back at some of
your own examples of where you blame others:
- Watch out for the feeling of embarrassment that you'll want to shove down quickly in angry blame, but which always hides the facts of your own choices in each incident.
- What do you learn about your choices?
- What other feelings are hidden behind that wall of blame?
Running away from responsibility, it always seems easiest to blame someone. If we run out of others to blame, well, we can always blame ourselves...
But that's no solution either:
since the threads of weird pass through everyone,
blaming others is, in a weird sense, blaming ourselves
and blaming ourselves is also a way of blaming
others. The real problem isn't who to blame, but blame itself.


Blaming ourselves
One of the traps when we first
recognize the dangers of blaming others is that we'll switch over to blaming
ourselves instead - and we'll have plenty of 'encouragement' to do so... "See! You admit it! It isn't all my fault, is it? So it must be all your fault -
go on, go on, admit it!"
And perhaps the most popular
tactic in the blame-game is the old 'all-or-nothing' trick: if you're willing to accept responsibility for anything at all, you must be willing to accept the blame for everything.
It's a massive disincentive
against honesty:
- but it does mean that once we do start to be a bit more
honest with ourselves, it's all too easy to take on far more responsibility and certainly far more blame - than is actually appropriate?
Back in primary-school days.
One of the students has pushed another's shoes into the toilet:
- the teacher wants to punish the culprit, so we're all stuck
here until someone owns up. We wait. And wait. And wait. Two hours pass: it's obvious no-one's going to admit to it. I look
around once more.
Oh well, someone's
got to do something, I suppose, so it may as well be me... The teacher frankly disbelieves my 'confession', but beats me anyway
- on principle, perhaps and lets everyone else go.
Do I get any thanks from the
real culprit, or anyone else, for my self-chosen martyrdom? Not likely! What I get instead is a great pile of mockery and everyone else's blame for
anything they can dump on me... Not a wise choice...
Go back to some incidents
of your own where you were 'over-responsibled' - for example, where you took on the responsibility for something which you didn't do and found yourself landed with the blame instead.
What did you feel when
your well-intentioned actions went so wrong? What did you - or do you - feel towards those who were so quick to use your self-blame to dump all their blame on you?
Looking back with the advantage
of hindsight, you're likely to have had some kind of warning from the weird that this kind of self-blame was not a good idea: and that 'warning' was likely to have been linked to a particular
feeling. Can you yet recognize this feeling of 'impending weird', which you can use to warn yourself in future?
Another word for self-blame is guilt:
- and trying to take on the guilt of others - trying to emulate "the one who died to take away the sins of the world" - is rarely wise, not least because those
others rarely notice anyway...
So self-scapegoating is a
problem; but there are other kinds of self-blame which are rather less honest. Sometimes it takes the form of 'playing victim' to oneself and blame our own
choices in the past in order to avoid responsibility in the present: "if only I hadn't done that to me, I'd be able to..."
Another
form is a variant of that old game of trying to gain "that special attention which is the perogative
of the miserable":
- if no-one else will blame me, so that I can complain about how unfair all this blaming is, I can probably get the same attention by blaming
myself... "Oh, woe is me! Oh, I have been so foolish! Look at what I have done wrong now!" says Chris, in over-dramatic voice...
I know that, at school and
elsewhere, I often tried to 'buy being liked' by blaming myself for everything that went
wrong, for anyone:
- I didn't like some of the 'attention' I got for doing
this, but at least it was attention...
And it took me many years
to stop blaming others for what they then 'did to me' as a result of my habit of
self-blame - and recognize that it was in my choice to end the hurt, simply by ending the dishonesty of blame.
In what ways have you 'played
victim' to yourself, in order to gain attention, or to avoid responsibilities in the present?
What did you feel about yourself
when you did this?
Feeling uncomfortable about that, how much did you blame others for 'doing it to you', when in fact you knew
it had been your own choice?
Blame
helps no-one. Once we start to look more closely at our own involvement in each interaction with others, it slowly becomes
obvious that we can't blame others:
- as the weird will often show us with startling
clarity, 'they' are just people, doing what people do and making mistakes just like everyone does.
But it's
then essential to remember that exactly the same applies to us:
we're human too, we make mistakes
too, just like everyone else and blaming ourselves helps no-one either.
What does
help is taking responsibility - the appropriate degree of 'response-ability'. Not too little - running away from responsibility - but also not too much:
- especially as some common ways of appearing
to be helpful or over-responsible - such as the 'gatekeeper' and the 'judge' - are really little more than a subtler version of
the blame-game.


The gatekeeper & the judge
A while back, we looked at
how we sometimes shirk our responsibility through 'faked incompetence', pretending that we're not capable of doing some task - such as the boring household chores, or tackling the frustrations of a new computer system. But it is true that everyone starts out incompetent at those tasks:
- and we can't do better than that unless we're genuinely encouraged to find our own power and responsibility within them - which we certainly won't be able to do unless we're allowed to learn.
What happens instead, in yet
another version of the blame-game, is that someone demands that we 'should' or 'ought' or
'must' do some task or learn some new skill and then acts as 'gatekeeper', preventing us from learning how to do the
task whilst at the same time complaining at us, or blaming us, for having supposedly refused
to do it.
Because the gatekeeper holds
back essential information, we can't do the task properly - or even at all and hence often give up in frustration: which is then taken as 'proof' that we've faked incompetence and ducked our responsibility.
The gatekeeper probably feels
equally frustrated - "dammit, it's quicker to do it myself!" - but often finds it easier to blame others than
to notice their own involvement in the situation...
Mary's landed me
w/the task of bringing Kaye up to speed on the new computer system. I must have shown her how to use it a dozen times today:
- but here she is again, with yet another question.
- How on earth am I supposed to do my own work with Kaye interrupting
me all the time?
"Look, it's simple: you click
here, then you select the next record, highlight it, then do this" (I quickly type
in a short key-sequence) "then cut and paste to the other file - okay?" And I'm already starting to walk back
to my desk before Kaye has a chance to say 'No'...
Five minutes later, she's
back again, looking more frustrated than ever and I'm fit to explode - "why can't you work it out for yourself?", I want to scream at her, "it's obvious,
dammit!" Just in time, though, a gentle hint comes drifting in from the weird:
- "How long have you been working on that system, Chris?
- 6 months?
- And how long has Kaye been using it - 6 hours, perhaps?
- So perhaps what's obvious to you might just possibly not be
obvious to her, eh?"
- Uh-oh... I've been playing 'gatekeeper' again, haven't I?
Better show her properly this
time - without blaming her for not knowing what she simply doesn't know and this
time find out first what is obvious to her, in order to find out what isn't...
In what circumstances and
for what tasks, do you find yourself playing 'gatekeeper'? Childcare? Household maintenance? Something at work that you think of as your own specialty, that you're certain no-one else could - or should - do as well as you?
Whilst appearing to help others
learn those tasks, in what ways do you actually prevent them from doing so and blame them
for it? To resolve this problem, 'do no-thing' about it: let those quiet inner whispers from the weird warn you when you're
doing it and take action when you hear them!
The 'judge' is another variant
of this: like the gatekeeper, it blames others for failing to do what it in effect prevents them from doing - but masks the dishonesty of the blame
with a great deal of righteous indignation.
Sounds like Mary's had real
problems with that client again: she's in one of her fortunately-rare 'judge, jury and executioner' moods and everyone's running
for cover. She'll soon find something wrong to get angry about: and this time it's Kaye who's not been quick enough to get her head down. "That's just not good enough, Kaye!", says
Mary. "You know that this form must be laid out in the way that I've said!"
Kaye mumbles something...
and Mary snaps back, "So what if it doesn't fit! That's your problem! Just do it!" She drops back into her 'sweet and reasonable'
voice - "Just do as I ask, will you?" and sweeps back to her office, putting on her smile-mask for the client as she does
so.
Out here, everyone else stops
holding their breath and we turn to the shell-shocked Kaye, to help her recover from The Judge...
Not pleasant... but it'll
probably be even less pleasant to turn this round and face what's really been going on in those times where you've played
The Judge... What was your righteous indignation there being used to hide - from others, or from yourself?
There's a weird twist to this.
Most people's idea of a judge seems to be that of someone in authority, with the right to have power over us: but the problem is exactly that, namely 'power-over'.
In a more practical sense,
'judgment' is about the development of skills and awareness - appropriacy, rather than abstract 'truth' - so the functional role of a 'judge' isn't to judge as such, but to help others develop their own judgment: power-with, not power-over.
So the more authority we gain,
the more responsibility is placed on us to mediate with others and the less right we have to judge others - which isn't quite how most people in 'authority' positions tend to see it... Yet successful leaders and successful relationships, depend on awareness of that twist.
I remember, a few years back,
watching a classic example of how not to do it - playing at 'judge', rather than being that role. It was at a kind of conference,
somewhat political, but there were also schools delegates there - even some from primary schools - so part of a formal agreement
signed by each delegate was a commitment not to use offensive language.
Unfortunately, one of the
organizers - taking an overly subject-centred attitude, as tends to happen at such events - decided that offensive language included any comment which in any way disagreed with his own personal politics: so he felt that he wasn't only within
his rights, but righteously correct, to publicly eject from the conference anyone whose words - or presence - he disliked.
A few people questioned his
behavior: this too was deemed offensive language and he demanded their instant removal too. Quite soon the discussions became quite heated - some of it using a great
deal of offensive language! - but eventually the organizer's 'judge'-game was brought to a halt: especially as the event's main theme was supposed
to be 'freedom of speech'...
"I disagree w/every word you
say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it": how easy is it for you to follow this old maxim about freedom of speech? To what extent do you want to control others' thoughts as well as their actions - or for them to control their thoughts to conform to your beliefs, which comes to the same thing?
Maintaining true thoughts of speech is always going to be difficult. The political-correctness movement, i.e., started with the laudable aim of creating
'non-offensive language', to reduce habitual disparagement of minorities. But it soon fell into that trap of playing The Judge,
issuing ever-more-tortuous tirades of blame and demanding increasingly harsh 'anti-vilification'
laws to vilify 'offenders', until eventually it became it became clear that its tactics were, in reality, even more oppressive than the original supposed
offensive language and the whole movement collapsed into self-parody, where it remains to this day.
A single thread of wyrd,
complete with the weird twist - its geas - through which it comes to its end... The aim of the movement was right and responsible; where it went wrong - the choice which was never faced and which led to its end - was in its dependence on blame.


Dancing with responsibility
Responsibility isn't something which can be dumped on others, but is a dance with ourselves - a dance with our own choices and our
own 'mistakes'. One shift in perspective that's important to make is to recognize that responsibility is about our responses and no one else's.
If I take offence at something
you've said, it's my response to your comments - not something you've done 'to' me - so I need to understand that the 'response-ability' to act on that response lies with me, not you. Anything else
is blame, which doesn't work: all it does is build more walls.
The aim here is to move from
'you - statements' - "you insulted me!" - to 'I - statements' - "I feel offended by what you've just said".
That shift in perspective
usually feels weird at first - 'I - statements' can sound pompous and stilted and can seem much more difficult to say,
mainly because we're accepting that the responsibility is on us rather than on 'the Other'.

Weird though it may feel,
it does work: a 'you - statement' builds walls of projection and blame, but an 'I
- statement' opens a doorway and creates a space for negotiation.
I still don't like
what you've said:
- but you're not an object, so I can't force you to 'take back
your words' and you're not my subject, so I can't demand that you change yourself to suit my whims. You're you; I'm me; 'We'
has a disagreement; let's talk about it...
"You insulted me!" Try watching the way you interact with others: notice how many 'you - statements' you use in a single day; notice how
many walls you build or reinforce that way...
So shift your perspective
and try to reframe those 'you - statements' into 'I - statements' - statements about what you feel, not what you think the other person did.

Notice how much easier it
is to blame others instead... so what is it that 'I - statements' demand from you?
At first, it's probably safest to practice this in private, such as in a personal diary; but aim to find the courage to put it into practice in public.
When you first do so, don't
be surprised if the initial response is one of mockery and disbelief - which will hurt. But if you can, persist, bearing always in mind that this is your 'response-ability':
then notice the weird 'negotiations' that begin to happen...
What we're doing here is working
with projection and export - both our own and that of others. The purpose of the shift to 'I - statements', weird though they
feel, is partly to provide enough awareness of our own self to enable us to identify the degree of our responsibility and hence our appropriate 'response-ability' and also to prevent us from responding in kind
when others blame us. With that awareness, we watch the feedback: both directly from those others and also from the more tortuous twists by which we get feedback from
the weird.
Projection and export depend
on blame - in many ways are blame and also depend
on playing dishonest games with boundaries. The first part of the game is a switch to a subject-centred view, to dissolve genuine boundaries and drag in some 'other' :
- "it wasn't me that broke the plate - it was my hand", says
a friend's small son.
The 'other' - whatever or
whoever it may be - is then assigned the entire blame for the incident:
- "it was my hand that did it!", exclaims the boy.
And the export is completed
by switching back to an object-centred view, slamming the boundary shut by making the other 'Other' again: the boy looks down at his hand and slaps it, saying "naughty hand! - you musn't never
do that again!" - so it's now the hand's responsibility, not his...

|
 |
|
parents blaming
themselves...
Stop blaming yourself for anorexia in
your child
Articles By Cris Haltom, Ph.D.
Writer Maryann MacDonald says
of parents of children with anorexia,
"Parents speak of the terrible guilt that almost overwhelms them..."
I've found that parents'
self-blame usually blocks progress in therapy, rather than helping it. Self-blame can deplete parents of positive motivation for change by creating in them shame, guilt & a paralyzing inability to self-forgive.
Here are 8 key reasons why
parents shouldn't blame themselves:
1.
Anorexia Can Be Hard To Spot. Often children with anorexia
focus on the problems of family & friends rather than themselves. They can be sensitive
& empathetic toward their parents & nurturing toward friends, thereby masking
their own problems.
Growing body dissatisfaction & weight obsession are hidden from view. Therefore, the early signals of an eating disorder are hidden as well.
2.
Children rarely blame parents for anorexia. During my
22 years of practice as a psychologist, I've rarely heard a young person with anorexia blame
a parent they live with for their anorexic behavior.
Rather, many other explanations
for anorexia are offered by clients. My own observation is that while certain parental behaviors may fan the flames of anorexia,
the source of the fire rests w/your child.
3. Anorexia
is a way of coping. Conventional wisdom states that
eating disorders are often a way of coping with life stresses.
For example, if your child
feels as if parts of her or his life are out of control, she or he may take control of one of the few areas that seem seem controllable: Eating.
I recall, during a segment
of my clinical internship at the Philadelphia Child Guidance Center, watching a training film of a father trying, unsuccessfully,
to force a hot dog into the mouth of his underweight daughter. This image stuck in my mind as a poignant example of a child's
absolute control over her choice to eat or not.
There are many ways your child
could cope w/life stresses. For whatever combination of reasons your child has zeroed in on anorexic behaviors as their way to adapt &
cope.
4. You
can't see hidden food restriction. Children w/anorexia are usually good at hiding
food restriction. They'll work diligently & methodically at keeping parents & others, from seeing their weight management
rituals. And, even if food restriction or purging is discovered, your child, young or old, may offer a good, often
logical, explanation for their behavior.
For example they may say,
'I had a snack earlier' or 'I'm not hungry right now so I'll eat later.'
5. Genetic
factors contribute to anorexia. There's an increasing amount of evidence that
genetic & physiological factors contribute to eating disorders. Michael Strober & colleagues have found that anorexia clusters in families & occurs more in some families across
generations.
Perhaps most convincing are
studies that show that among twins raised together, identical twins are much more likely to both develop anorexia than
are fraternal twins.
Because identical twins share
the same genes & fraternal twins do not, these studies indicate genetics play an important role in anorexia.
A recent study by Kelly Klump,
Ph.D., at Western Psychiatric Institute & Clinic in Pittsburg showed certain personality characteristics which can contribute
to anorexia may be inherited.
You may have contributed genes
to your child but there's little you could've done about this.
6. Self-blame impedes the process of recovery. When parents blame themselves, they can actually hinder the process of recovery. Parents
burdened with guilt become more sensitive, vulnerable & self-deprecating.
In order to 'lighten the load',
parents may place blame on someone else. Also, we, as parents, may block our ability
to truly listen to our children when we're too consumed with
self-blame.
7. Anorexia looks so normal in its early stages.
Sometimes we, as parents, jump the gun with our children's problems. We make a bigger
problem than really exists because we find some small piece of scary evidence, like cigarettes in a child's back pack.
With anorexia, there often
isn't any scary evidence in the early stages. Shrouded in secrecy by your child & cloaked by the altogether common complaints of young
people about 'being too fat' or 'too flabby', anorexic behavior is insideous & easily disguised as normalcy.
Unlike underage drinking or
getting high on recreational drugs, there's nothing unusual about a young person dieting or exercising a little too much.
It's no wonder you couldn't see it coming.
8.
Media exposure contributes to anorexia. In today's world, you can't prevent your
child from being constantly exposed to the media.
Men are expected to be buff & lean & women are expected to be thin & lithe. Unfortunately, fashion has little tolerance for different body shapes & sizes. Our media exposure unquestionably contributes
to the development of anorexia in both boys & girls.
IN SUMMARY, parental self-blame can merely prolong symptoms & prevent solutions for the treatment of anorexia. In fact, blame
isn't a useful concept in the treatment of anorexia. What makes more sense is for family members of a child with anorexia
to come together in a positive, constructive way to seek change.
Parents can play an important role in recovery by supporting their child as the child engages
in her or his own process of change.
RESOURCES: MacDonald, Maryann (1993) "Bewildered, Blamed, and Broken-hearted: Parents' Views of Anorexia." In B. Lask and R. Bryant-Waugh
(Eds.), Childhood Onset Anorexia Nervousa and Related Eating Disorders, (pp.1-16). UK: Psychology Press. "Anorexia Nervosa: Personality Traits Can be Genetically Transmitted," (1999) Eating Disorders Review.
Gurze Publications. Vol 10: 5, p.1.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Blaming others easy way out; way to solution found in
mirror
By Kacey Hercules
In the short story The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson, the community has to make a sacrifice each
year to ensure a good harvest. They came to the conclusion that whoever won the lottery would be the one stoned to death.
It's wrong to blame a single person for the problems of an entire community. This is called scapegoating. In
America we are no strangers to having scapegoats & many blame our social ills mainly
on the youth, media & our parents.
Some older people in our society believe that the youth of today is the fall of tomorrow, but this is far from true. According to Taste Berries for Teens by Bettie
B. Youngs & Jennifer Leigh Youngs, 95% of news about youth is related to drugs, violence & gangs, yet only 5% of teenagers
commit these crimes.
Teenagers accept the people around them with open arms of friendship. I read in USA Today about 2 teenage boys with different faiths being
friends. One of the boys was Jewish & the other Muslim.
I also read in The Tennessean
about a group of teenagers selling their artwork to help feed the homeless. Many high schools across the state are supporting
this project. There are many other teens whose strides toward making the world a better place go unnoticed.
The older generation
should be proud in knowing that tomorrow is going to be brighter than today.
The media has been
a scapegoat in our country far too long & it's time we give it a break. You may be asking yourself, "Do the stories presented
by the media affect our children?" Children that copycat violence that they see on the media also have an inner problem of
anger or rejection that parents should be aware of.
To say that the media is in someway responsible for violent acts is using it as a scapegoat. Parents should talk to their kids about taking responsibility for their own actions & always be prepared to turn the television off if they feel the need to.
Freedom of the press is an essential right that we have & it's what we,
as a country need in a time of crisis.
A prime example of this is Sept. 11th, 2001. Everyone gathered
around the television to hear the breaking news on the attacks on the World Trade Center & the Pentagon.
The media has done some good for society in light of what happened that day. The U.S. entertainment
industry has started a campaign to stop the harassing of United States Muslims & Arab Americans w/public service announcements.
Many people blame their parents for mistakes they make, but
often they fail to realize that they make their own choices. Have you ever heard someone blame their smoking
habit on the fact that their parents smoke?
"Taste Berries for Teens" has given a
good example of how crazy it is to blame your parents for your choices .
In the short story I'm Writing you from Prison, a 20-year-old blames his father
for leaving his mother & that's the reason he has a habit of stealing cars. On the other hand, Dave Pelzer had a very
abusive mother. He lived in foster care when he was a teenager until he became an adult. He didn't let his past ruin his future &
now he is a very successful man & author.
All parents are human & we have
to overcome the effect they have on us. In the end we are the maker of our life.
In
The Lottery Mrs. Hutchinson had nothing to do w/the harvest being good or bad, but she was stoned anyway. The world needs to stop stoning others for our problems & take responsibility for our own actions.
Being aware of problems & looking in the mirror for solutions, is a big step for solving society's major problems. If we could come
together for the common good, instead of blaming others, the world would be a happier & safer place to live.
Kacey Hercules is a freshman social work major and can be reached via e-mail
at kah2x@mtsu.edu.edu
Don't Look For Someone to Blame; Concentrate on Solutions
Learning to place blame comes early in life as
witnessed by second grader David's self-evaluation in school, "Most of the time I get into trouble it's Roberts fault."
(David's spelling.) Robert's self-evaluation included, "I can't sit next to David
any more. He talks too much." It comes as no surprise to learn that David & Robert are best friends.
In any human endeavor, when something goes wrong,
it's only natural to think immediately of who made it go wrong, who is to blame. Most
often this makes the problem worse. The person blamed, in order to exonerate himself
or herself, promptly finds someone else to lay the blame on or with whom to share the responsibility for failure. It frequently turns into a shouting match of exchanged accusations. "It's all your fault.... "You did....."
"Yes, but you said....." All too familiar dialogue.
Either the accuser or the victim can put a stop
to this, though better yet, head it off by getting all those involved to direct their attention to a solution to the problem.
"This isn't getting us anywhere. The past is past. What's done is done. Here's where we are now. What
can we do about it? Let's work together. Charlie, what do you suggest?"
In a business partnership, or in any other kind
of joint endeavor, for that matter, things go along smoothly as long as it is profitable & successful. When trouble
arises, however, you find out what kind of partners you have. Problems compound when partners blame
each other & start fighting among themselves.
Keep the team together. And if you are in the middle
of a big blow-up w/tempers flaring, suggest that the group disband & meet again later, preferably tomorrow when people
have cooled down.
Determine The Cause
Repeat over & over, "Let's concentrate on the
solutions." Try to keep the situation from deteriorating w/the result that additional difficulties inevitably arise.
This doesn't mean that one shouldn't start promptly
to understand what or who caused the problem, but frequently, it's a situation beyond anyone's
control. If so, this should be strongly emphasized. Some bureaucratic bungle, for example, may have to be straightened
out. However, we usually find that the cause involves people.
Often the problem is lack of training, or lack
of information. Sometimes a collective deadline is missed because one person or one unit failed.
In some cases, if someone just committed a stupid
blunder which caused a problem, that person probably feels bad enough without being made more miserable w/accusations. Perhaps the saddest situation of all is when a person is having blame
heaped on himself or herself when the action which caused the difficulty was completely accidental.
When Beverly & Barbara were young, Beverly
was swinging her little sister around in a typical childhood activity. Barbara hit her head on a piece of furniture,
eliciting wails of pain. It was an obvious accident, but something had gone wrong. Who was to blame? Beverly, of course. Admonishments & even anger were heaped on the poor little girl who felt miserable enough about hurting her sister. Both of the children were hurt, in different ways, but Beverly's might well have been the deeper hurt.
Several people comforted Barbara. Only one was sensitive enough to comfort Beverly, with such consoling statements as, "It wasn't your fault, Beverly. It was just an accident. Barbara
is going to be all right."
Find a Solution
If the reason for the problem is inefficiency,
more training is needed, or those not performing properly should be warned, removed or immobilized. If a particularly contentious person, or
more than one, is creating personality problems, this should be addressed by rearranging authority, by circumvention, or by
head-on discussion w/those who are offending. These are all steps to finding a solution & are much to be preferred
to the, "IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT" syndrome. 
Another situation must be considered, one which
is frequently overlooked. There can be those who, w/hidden motives or sometimes motives not so hidden, are purposely trying to scuttle a project to achieve their own ends.
But means can be found to prevent this. Meet with
them & seek an accommodation. This may justify a one-on-one frank & open discussion as described in Chapter 23, "Solving the Problem One On One".
Stick Together
It's such a tragedy when people, friends or family,
for example, face a problem & end up alienated from each other. Rather than binding together, they split apart. Reports indicate that when a couple loses a
child in death, it frequently causes a divorce. Yet bereavement is the time when they should be comforting each other, when the deepest love should & can prevail.
To summarize, when things go wrong, don't just
look for someone to blame. Keep the team/family together & turn the effort toward
finding a solution. In doing so, analyze the circumstances as well as the motivations of those involved & take the action necessary to put the situation back on track.
Blame most often prevents a solution.
Just How Much Responsibility Should
We Take?
I'm a big believer in personal responsibility.
Did you ever wonder what our world would be like if everyone in it always took responsibility for themselves? There certainly would be fewer problems & less drama. I bet our 24-hour news programs would have a hard
time coming up w/enough material to fill the airwaves.
In my experience, people who consistently take responsibility are few & far between. Most people seem to find it easier to blame the government,
their parents, their spouse, their kids or the star under which they were born for anything they don't like. It's a rare person
who first looks at their part in producing the results in their life.
So on the one hand we have people who blame others &don't take responsibility. And on the other, we have those who take total responsibility for their lives. But in my opinion, this is not the full picture.
I believe the truly responsible person is in the middle of the spectrum rather than the opposite end. The far left belongs to those who take TOO MUCH responsibility. Instead of blaming others, they blame themselves.
I won't tell you that I've always been personally responsible. I haven't. I do my best not to blame others & I think for the most part I succeed.
But I've also fallen to the other extreme. I took too much responsibility - I blamed myself.
Blaming yourself is no better than blaming others. In fact, it may be even
more destructive.
I've read of many veterans who felt guilt for having survived while their fellow soldiers were killed. My father,
a B-17 pilot during World War II, writes in Ready or Not: Into the Wild Blue, about this feeling after his liberation from a German prison camp: "I had been having a difficult time relating to people
. . . it was impossible for me to show gratitude. My sleep was sporadic & nights were filled w/remorse for my comrades
who were lost & especially my 3 crewmen who died."
He's a caring man & I believe to this day he still has similar feelings. But it's sometimes a fine line between empathy & blaming one's self. Feeling bad about the misfortune of others doesn't help them
or us. It may keep us even more stuck.
And feeling guilt about what we've done or what we've failed to do doesn't help either. This is an over-sense
of responsibility.
If you're one of those people who takes on too much, I hope you'll recognize this in yourself. In doing so, you can begin to direct your energy in a more constructive fashion.
In attempting to be a person of responsibility, we can sometimes slip into self reproach. The aim is to be personally responsible w/out blaming,
without taking on too much.
I'm Sorry! Blame-Game
or Accountability? By Sharon Ellison
A powerful tool for health can be to focus on giving &/or receiving only real apologies when we want to heal a rift with a family member, friend, or co-worker. We hear apologies all the time, but I don't think many of them are sincere. An apologies has to be real to heal.
Trang Lei spent
the day helping Martha buy furniture & art for her remodeled living room, but Martha never even offered to buy Trang Lei's
lunch & so she felt unappreciated. Later when she told Martha she felt hurt, Martha said, "I'm sorry. I was just so excited about what I was buying that I didn't even think about it." Trang Lei didn't feel better. In fact, she felt worse.
· What was wrong with
Martha's apology?
Martha's apology came with a built-in excuse, implying that however she behaved was unintentional-beyond her conscious control. Moreover,
Martha has an expectation that Trang Lei will accept the excuse. Thus, Martha perpetuates the original problem by continuing to be more focused on herself than on Trang Lei.
I call this kind of apology "Sorry-Excuse."
Even Martha wasn't
consciously manipulating, her goal wasn't to take responsibility but to find a way out of it. In most cases, if you don't
accept other people's excuses when they apologize, they'll quickly get irrupted at you, blaming you for not being understanding.
When we receive
a counterfeit apology we often sense it & so rather than the hurt being healed, it's deepened-as in the old saying, "adding insult to injury." I think almost all of us give such apologies. And we model it for our children.
Guidelines for making real apologies:
One: Identify
common formats for apology that are" counterfeit."
If you clearly hear various
types of bogus apologies, it'll help you recognize when you give or receive an one. Here are some examples of common phrasing.
· "Sorry-Excuse" · Example:
"I'm sorry I didn't call-I've been really busy." · Translation: Please be understanding about the fact that other things
were more important than you."
· "Sorry-Denial of Intent" ·
Example: "I'm sorry you took it that way. It wasn't what I meant." · Translation: I think it's too bad that you had difficulty understanding me correctly.
· Example: "I'm sorry if I offended you." ·
Translation: I can't think of anything I did wrong, but if you think so, I'd be happy to apologize so I can get back in your good graces.
· "Sorry-Blame" · Example:
"I'm sorry I didn't call sooner. Have you been feeling Insecure about our relationship lately?" · Translation: If you're
upset about my not calling, the real cause is your own insecurity, not anything I did.
Two: Only
say "I'm sorry," when you mean it & can specify exactly what you're apologizing for.
When we give what
I believe is a "healthy" or authentic apology, we can state clearly what we did that was disrespectful or inconsiderate without:
· immediately explaining why we did it, · telling
the person that however it looked or sounded, it wasn't our real intention, or, · bringing up some other issue that suggests
that the other person contributed to or caused the problem.
For example, instead
of focusing on why she didn't buy Trang-Lei's lunch-her excuse, Martha could have taken full responsibility, saying,
"I'm so sorry I hurt you. There's no excuse for me to forget to buy your lunch. Even that would have been a small thank
you for how much you helped me. And you spent your only day off doing it."
Here, Martha uses
her apology to show her real appreciation as well as her sadness that she didn't do so earlier.
· Three:
Decline to accept an apology that isn't given sincerely.
When you accept an apology & then walk away knowing it wasn't real, you enter a world of make-believe where you pretend an issue is resolved
while harboring resentments. Gently, firmly, without anger, you can decline a hollow apology.
For example:
· If you believe
that I simply misunderstood you, then I'd rather not have an apology from you.
· Only if you believe
you did something hurtful would I want one.
When you refuse to accept an insincere apology, you refuse to surrender to being manipulated or pacified & you hold the other person more accountable - without having to argue or try to force an apology. You're likely to feel greater confidence.
Real Apologies Build Character & Respect
If we can change how we give & receive apologies, we can become less defensive, gain insight, grow wiser & strengthen all of our relationships. We can also, then, be a strong model for others, including our children,
teaching them that real apologies show strength of character, gain the respect of others & have great healing power.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|